BIOLOGY 103
       LAB 11:  ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOLOGY

 
 


Preview

List of articles

Report due Monday

What you'll be tested on later

back to Bio103 homepage

Is it ethically wrong  to implant recombinant DNA in faculty F-2s?

PREVIEW: You will

  1. watch at least one video during lab time,

  2. read at least one article on the approved list, and

  3. read at least one very recent relevant news article
    (like from
    http://science.bio.org/)

  4. type a report chart, either by yourself or with one or two collaborators.

Everything in this lab is about ethical issues, not science.   Science is about disproving facts and hypotheses; ethics is about deciding what is right or wrong, moral or immoral, fair or not fair, just or unjust.  You don't have to make the decisions this week; you just have to identify the issues or raise the questions.  Then you have to figure out if any scientific facts have anything to do with the issue.       
                              

 

APPROVED LIST OF ARTICLES: Read at least one of the following (more articles may be added by lab time; some articles from "sciencemag.org" require a subscription and you have to use the terminals in the library to access them unless the article was published at least a year ago. (Sometimes sciencemag.org articles can be accessed from a lab terminal if a professor has logged on there.)

For your report: Make a table with two columns.  List at least 20 ethical issues on the left-hand column.  Be brief, but make sure the grader can tell that you know why each item is an ethical issue.  On the right, for each issue type at least one molecular genetics "tool" or genetic engineering procedure or technical fact which is relevant to that particular ethical issue.  Include your source for the information. 

Example:

ISSUE   RELEVANT SCIENTIFIC FACT
1. Is it wrong to do experimental gene therapy on a chimpanzee fetus? 98.5% of chimp DNA is identical to human DNA (Science 281:1432).
          or
Recombinant DNA could be implanted into fetal cells using a viral vector (text 257)
2.  Is it fair to make everybody pay for the cost of extra labeling when food is made with genetically-engineered produce? genes for longer shelf life were implanted into tomatoes using a ti-43 plasmid vector (text 283)
3. etc.  until you have at least 20  
17.  If you run out of ideas, go back to Lab 1.  In part 2, "ISSUES," the problem of doubt or uncertainty about scientific facts (like a diagnosis based on a probe procedure) is relevant for many genetic engineering applications.   

You should make sure you master chapter 16 before you finish this project.


Another example.  This is what Tony Goodwin wrote in 1998 (he made an A on this report, of course):

20 Ethical Questions

1. Are patients better off with no therapy rather than suffer through that which is often costly and only somewhat effective?

2. If genetic screening reveals a chance for parents to pass on mutant genes to a child, then should those parents go ahead and have offspring?


3. Though DNA fingerprinting is enough to prove someone innocent of a crime, should it be enough to prove someone guilty?
4. Should the results of a person's genetic profile or possible genetic disorders be revealed to the public?

5. Should doctor-patient confidentiality be put aside when someone applies to a company for life insurance?

6. With the high cost of health care, should patients be made to stay in the hospital to properly screen for genetic disorders?

7. If genetic screening shows that a fetus will be born with cystic fibrosis or some other genetic disorder, should it be aborted before birth or allowed to live?

8. If a particular sex is predisposed to a genetic disorder or disease, then should genetic screening be used to decide if a fetus should be terminated so that it cannot be a potential sufferer or carrier ?

9. Should a person at risk for a genetic disorder have preventive surgery or take their chances without it?

10. Should people be exposed to treatment for one genetic disorder without doctors testing to see if a patient can contract something else as a result of the treatment?

11. Should new genetic screening technology be regulated by government or a world council rather than the business community?

12. How will new DNA Technology be made available to anyone other than the upper class, as it can be very expensive?

13. Will the mapping of genes on a genome come in time to really benefit mankind, or should be begin to pursue other avenues of research?

14. Is it fair to disclose info.about tests, their purposes,
limitations, or possible outcomes before results are given?

15. Is it right to require genetic testing for employment?

16. As genetically impaired offspring are released into society, it's likely that a good many of them will grow and have more offspring themselves. Therefore, is the general poplulace likely to see a great deal more genetically impaired people in the future?

17. Are all mutations detected by screening malignant?

18. Many genetic advances in areas of genetic research are made with the use of animal subjects. Is this the best and safest form of research?

19. In this country, African-Americans show a strong propensity to develop the genetic disorder sickle cell anemia. Should this be a basis for denying them health care and other insurance benefits?

20. What is the ultimate goal of this extensive DNA research and genetic screening, and why is not a cure all panacea, as some feel?

Sources and Examples

1. A recent survey for 351 diseases caused by single gene mutations showed that the patient's lifespan was improved by only 15%.

2. Ex. 9% of women who inherit one mutant copy of gene BRCA1 have a 60% chance of having breast cancer by age 50, and an 82% chance of developing it by age 70. In contrast, women who inherit 2 normal genes are 2% and 7%, respectively. Pg. 390 Life: The Science of Biology.

3. Two people could have the same DNA patterns, since what is being tested is just a small sample of the genome. More than this is needed to stand up in court. P. 370 Life: The Science of Biology.
4. The many linkages of genetic abnormalities, from manic depression to schizophrenia, has led to the potential for screening and then social manipulation of those at risk. P. 397 Life: The Science of Biology
5. People who test positive for genetic abnormalities, from cancer to hypercholesterolemia, might be denied employment or health insurance. P. 397 Life: The Science of Biology.

6. Possibly. Ex. PKU may not show up for days in infants, and many mothers leave the hospital early to keep costs low. By the time the medical staff is able to contact them, considerable brain damage may already have been done. P. 384 Life: The Science of Biology
7. Babies born with cystic fibrosis, FH, etc. die in their early 20's
and 30's. P. 376

8. Ex. It is known that hemophilia exists on the Y chromosome, and therefore transmitted by females. If genetic screening shows that a female fetus is a carrier, should that baby be terminated so that the disease won't spread to future generations?

9. Ex. A person who inherits mutated copies of the tumor-suppressor genes involved in colon cancer normally would have a high chance of developing this tumor by age 40. Surgical removal of the colon would prevent this from happening. P. 390 Life: The Science of Biology.
10. Before doctors fully understood AIDS, many hemophiliacs were given HIV-positive blood, and as a result, they contracted the virus.
P. 392 Life: The Science of Biology.

11. The Affymetrix company is suing Incyte Pharmaceutical Inc. and Synteni Inc. for patent infringement, while also filing suit against Hyseq company. With companies large and small fighting over the DNA  chip technology, it could be years before the technology becomes available. Science Magazine Online "Will Patent Fights Hold DNA Chips Hostage?" www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/282/5388/397
12. Affymetrix chips run between $45.00 and $850.00, not to mention fluidic stations, which can cost more than $100,000.
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/282/5388/397


13. The DNA of a molecule that is 50 million base pairs long cannot be sequenced in that form; only 500 base pairs at a time can be sequenced. P. 394 Life: The Science of Biology.

14. For info. see www.faseb.org/genetics/acmg/pol-17.htm


15. For info, see www.acoem

16. Doubtful. Ex. PKU only affects 1 out of every 12,000 newborns. Polymorphism only affects about 1% of the population, and even then it DOES NOT necessarily mean disease. P. 375 Chapter 17 Life: The Science of Biology.

17. No. Ex. Analysis of the phenylaline hydroxylase protein in
different people often showed variations that have no functional
signifigance, nor any harmful effects. P. 375 Chapter 17 Life: The Science of Biology.

18. Possibly. Ex. Research with animals lead to advances with
recombinant DNA, which enabled researchers to develop synthetic insulin for certain types of diabetes patients. However, the process of purifying the insulin was long and tedious, and some of the patients' immune systems rejected the insulin proteins violently.
19. No, because though blacks show a propensity to develop sickle cell, it is still not a very common occurrence. Only 1 in 655 will be affected by it. P. 376 Life: The Science of Biology Table 17.1.

20. We are individuals, not clones. Each of us, though we share
many similarities, have different genetic makeups; with all the
variables in one's life (enviornment, heredity, etc.) there is no
accurate way to predict how vulnerable or how resistant a person is to a myriad of genetic flaws or imperfections. So the real motive for such extensive research in genetics and DNA may be that, for all our great advances and knowledge, we are still only left with a few clues as to why God and nature have conspired to make us so different, and in many way, so very much the same.


WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW FOR TEST #3 and THE EXAM
You must be able to
  • weigh ethical considerations, from at least two points of view.
  • analyze and interpret news reports (like from http://science.bio.org/ ), including their ethical implications,
  • suggest specific experimental tools or procedures which could provide evidence for legal cases (some people consider justice to be ethical),
  • display sophisticated understanding of replication and transcription and translation and all their connections with genetics and technology,
  • develop more sophisticated answers to some of the issues about scientific uncertainty from  Lab 1
  • and don't forget:  identify ethical issues, be able to explain the science involved, and be able to summarize at least two opposing viewpoints about what should be the right thing to do.

For example, the smoking/bladder cancer gene connection 
Once we find out that somebody has a gene which may predispose them to a disease, do we have a right to penalize them or exclude them from our medical insurance pool if they don't change their dangerous habits?  In fact, once we have scientific evidence that a substance is a mutagen or carcinogen, should we make laws to protect people from it?  What kinds of laws?



~~~~~back to Bio103 homepage~~~~~

       


Last updated 12 Nov 2003 
jannr@queens.edu
  
Copyright © 1998-2003

     

 Queens University of Charlotte    1900 Selwyn Avenue  Charlotte, NC  28274