|
The main
focus is genetic variation. Keep in mind
that genes are the important link connecting the
topics before and after fall break.
To measure genetic variation (and even just to think about
genetic variation) biologists use frequency
distributions. You are already familiar with
other frequency distributions, like bell-shaped curves and the
grade distribution for the last test. When a population is
evolving, there is a change in the frequency distribution of its
genetic characteristics-- its
bell-shaped curves become fatter or skinnier or skewed in one or
both directions. Biologists think about evolving
populations this way: When a particular allele
increases survivorship or fecundity or immigration of
individuals, the frequency of that allele increases in the
population's next generation and the graph of the frequency
distribution changes shape. A change in
frequency distribution is evidence of evolution in progress.
MOST
IMPORTANT POINTS FROM THE TEXTBOOK
- Review genetics concepts, especially polymorphic,
mutation, genotype,
phenotype
- Allele frequency is a simple concept--like grade
distributions and the graphs of
genetic (allele) frequency distributions which are on pages
422, 425, 440, 441, and 442 and many more which may appear in class or on
upcoming tests, etc. Make sure you know what the
graphs show and
why they are important.
-
The Hardy-Weinberg Law (pages 433 ff.) is a
mathematical proof (but you can ignore the math
unless you're interested) that frequency
distribution of alleles stays in equilibrium; in other words,
genetic frequency cannot change from one generation to another
unless something "selects" one allele over its
alternatives: these "somethings" which do change
the equilibrium are important and listed on page 433.
These five factors which can change the Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium give biologists a method of measuring the rate of
evolution and they guide biologists to focus on the possible
sources of changes in frequency distribution.
- connect the four mechanisms on p. 429 to the five
assumptions on p. 433 ; then
try to imagine replacing the marbles on fig. 22.3 with individual
genotypes.
- Genetic Drift is related to several
other concepts: the founder
effect and genetic
bottlenecks or sampling errors in that the
population size becomes so small that chance causes
changes in the frequency distribution. Small
population size should be #1 on the list of conditions which upset
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Genetic
drift and the founder effect and genetic bottlenecks are
important because they explain how evolution could occur
without natural selection (=how some populations have
genetic differences which are not adaptations). Note
that gene flow has an opposite
effect of bottlenecks: gene flow increases
variation within a population and makes the population
more like similar populations. Which of the five
factors does "gene flow" violate?
- Also, just in case you need to be reminded, like
most previous chapters, again, we're really talking about sex
again. See p. 442 ff. Non-random mating is when certain genetic
characteristics cause some individuals to
be more likely to mate.
When genetic characteristics evolve only for attracting
mates (and apparently do not contribute to
"survival of the fittest") we call this sexual
selection. The sexiest alleles become more
frequent in the next generation. In Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium, all alleles must be equally sexy so that mating
is completely random.
-
Frequency distributions are NOT the same as the 3/4:1/4 ratios
you find in F2's. If you keep getting confused, Hardy and/or Weinberg had
to explain it to Punnett, too. Frequency distributions
show how common an allele is in a real population (with or
without random mating), not just in the offspring of hybrids.
-
|
Hardy-Weinberg
Equilibrium =
- No evolution
- No natural selection
- No adapting
- No genetic change
- No change in frequency distribution of
polymorphic alleles
(So are any populations actually in
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium? Biologists say
NO. Hardy-Weinberg lets us calculate a frequency
distribution "control" or null model for estimating rates
of evolution.) |
- The most important concept = Natural Selection
pp. 440 ff. Adaptations are phenotypes which increase the
probability of success in the particular habitat where individuals compete to
reproduce, to avoid predators and to capture prey,
maybe to migrate etc. These adaptations
are the focus of most news stories
on natural selection. Again, you must try to imagine
that the "selective agents" or factors in a
particular habitat would tend to "weed out"
individuals with noncompetitive phenotypes, controlled by
genes which affect camouflage, speed, visual acuity,
agility, intelligence, metabolism, number and sizes
of eggs in a clutch, sizes of seeds and hardness of their
coats, beak size of seed-eating birds, anti-herbivore
toxins in leaves, sexy smells, hairiness, hair color....
The alleles of the most competitive individuals become more
frequent in the next generation. In other words, the
population becomes better adapted. In
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, all alleles must be equally
advantageous so that no "agents of selection" have
any effect on relative survival or reproduction. In
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, adaptation does NOT occur.
| When a particular
allele increases the survivorship or fecundity
or immigration of individuals, the frequency
of that allele increases in the population's
next generation. |
This concept is a re-statement of Natural Selection: populations
evolve because individuals with favorable
characteristics have more offspring. Now that we know more
about genetics of individuals and genetic variation in
populations, we can develop a more
sophisticated understanding of natural selection. This
part of the chapter is about fitness, which biologists
define as the ability of an individual to produce more
offspring who survive and then reproduce themselves,
transmitting these "successful" genes to yet another
generation. Individuals with greater fitness contribute
more genes to the gene pool of future
generations of their species or at least their population.
- In this part of the chapter we are concerned with how the genetic
composition of a population adapts to a particular ecological
niche when individuals compete to reproduce, to avoid predators
and to capture prey, maybe to migrate etc.
Imagine how an individual's fitness can be changed by genes
which control camouflage, speed, visual acuity, agility,
intelligence, metabolism, number and sizes of eggs in a clutch,
sizes of seeds and hardness of their coats, beak size of
seed-eating birds, anti-herbivore toxins in leaves, sexy smells,
hairiness, hair color.... In fact, it's hard to think of a
gene which does not have some impact on reproduction or at least
surviving long enough to reproduce.
- In a changing world, however, a genetic advantage is only
temporary. A large seed or egg reduces juvenile mortality
only until the advent of a large predator. A sexy smell
which attracts mates or pollinators may also attract parasites.
Populations or species without genetic alternatives become
extinct when their world changes. Species which have
avoided extinction seem to be those with flexibility in their gene
pools; this flexibility is usually called genetic
variation or genetic diversity.
- Make sure that you
understand how the examples in the book connect to the
information above; and be able to define, compare and
contrast, and USE these terms:
| Sexual
Selection, a continuing controversy. Darwin
invented this term to explain cases in which bright
colors and fancy equipment, like a peacock's tail, seem
to evolve simply to attract mates despite their probable
disadvantages in survival. Some biologists
agree with Darwin on this point, but others think that
the "handicaps" are like advertisements for
superior genes and resistance to parasitic disease.
Hypotheses about attracting mates and competing for
mates is a big field in biology today. You might
want to read Why Is Sex Fun? by
Biologist Jared Diamond or check out some of these
articles:
|
|
When a particular allele
increases survivorship or fecundity or immigration of
individuals, the frequency of that allele increases in
the population's next generation.
|
- CHECKLIST: evolution,
allele frequencies, natural selection, populations,
mutation, gene flow, migration, genetic drift, adaptation,
fitness, genetic diversity, resistance to disease,
Hardy-Weinberg principle or Law, gene pool, random allele
frequency changes, random mating, nonrandom mating, sexual
selection, heterozygote advantage, mutation
rates, genome, genetic marker, "fixed" alleles,
genetic bottleneck, inbreeding, inbreeding depression,
"self-incompatibility" loci, directional
selection, oscillating directional selection,
stabilizing selection, disruptive selection, sexual
dimorphism, energy investment, parental care
investment, null model,
- SAMPLE QUIZ
and TEST QUESTIONS
- http://wps.prenhall.com/esm_freeman_biosci_1/0,6452,499541-,00.html
- summary review #1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- Content #1,2,3,4,5,6,*7; Conceptual #1, 3; Applying
#4 (also at end of chapter)
- These also:
-
A change in the relative proportions of alles in the gene
pool is the Hardy-Weinberg definition of
[a] artificial selection. [b] evolution. [c] fit individual.
[d] founder or founder effect. [e] species.
- Which of the following is NOT a condition of the
Hardy-Weinberg Law?
[a] all mating must be random. [b]
natural selection must occur.
[c] the gene pool must be large enough to be unaffected by
chance events.
-
Since the genes for hemoglobin include normal alleles and
also alleles which cause sickle-cell disease, geneticists say
that the hemoglobin trait or locus is
[a] hybrid. [b] mutant. [c] pleiotropic. [d] polymorphic
-
A change in a gene pool simply by chance occurs in
the founder effect and also in
[a] artificial selection. [b] disruptive selection. [c] genetic
drift. [d] pleiotropy.
Which of these is most likely to be the label on the
vertical axis of a gene frequency distribution?
[a] alleles. [b] genotypes. [c] phenotypes. [d] percentage of
population. you want answers?
-
Survival of the fittest = "may the best team
win"....does the best adapted team always win?
Explain.
- Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection explains evolution.
Is evolution itself also a theory?
- Or is evolution more like a law?
- Or is it only a belief and not true science, as claimed by
a creationist?
- Or is it the cornerstone of modern biology, as resolved by
the NC Academy of Science?
- [To answer
this question, consider the science news stories you've
studied all semester; do the hypotheses and experiments seem
to be
- direct tests of evolution? or
- tests of hypotheses with no connection to
evolution at all? or
- tests of hypotheses based on a tacit assumption
that evolution happens?]
- By the next test, you should be able to fill an entire
blue book with answers to these questions. Obtw,
is it EVER scientifically proper to say, "only a
theory"?
answers 1b
2b 3d 4c
5d
Research News
Resources for learning more about evolution and natural
selection
|