![]() |
| History Department |
History 307 - Latin America – October 29 & 31, 2003
THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION (1910-1920)
I. BACKGROUND
A. Tremendous problems with “nation-building”
1. Destruction of Wars of Liberation
2. Huge role of military
3. Little Political Consensus: huge class/race divisions; most people are excluded from system; no active citizenry
4. Continuing colonial economy: (a) elite run; (b) keyed to outsiders’ needs
B. Yet successes
1. Brazil; Chile; Argentina
2. Political stability after years of “caudilloismo”
3. Economic Growth
4. Immigration
II. Mexico’s violent road to Independence
A. 1810 – Fr. Hidalgo; 1822, Conservative-led Independence; Santa Anna; disastrous war with USA; foreign intervention; B. Juarez
B. 1876: General Porfirio Diaz seizes power
III. The “Porfiriato” Dictatorship (1876-1911)
A. Diaz as “modern” Caudillo
B. Supported by Ultra-Conservative Hacendados & “modern” Business executives
C. Diaz supports PROGRESS
D. “Los Cientificos” – technocrats attempt to build a modern economy
E. Mexico’s Boom Years: vast building projects; immigration; foreign investment; wealth
IV. The Grim Side of the Porfiriato
A. Wealth congeals at very top of social system
B. Repression to preserve CHEAP LABOR: break up unions; let corporate executives or hacendos agree among themselves on how low to fix wages; child labor; dangerous working conditions
C. Spectacular luxury at top, but very little social investment (schools, housing, health care)
D. Growth but not Development
E. Rigid exclusion of workers, peasants, women, poor from political process
V. Classic “CRISIS OF FRUSTRATED EXPECTATIONS”
A. People want DEMOCRATIC PROSPERITY & PROSPEROUS DEMOCRACY
B. But: are violently excluded from it
VI. The Mexican Revolution (1910-1920)
1876-1911
the “Porfiriato”
The Moderate Phase
1910
Francisco MADERO calls for sweeping liberal reforms: end to Diaz dictatorship; free elections; free speech; limits on Hacendados’ power; “PLAN OF SAN LUIS POTOSI
1911
Diaz Resigns; Madero president
Moderates try to construct functioning democracy, but
They are unwilling or unable to make RADICAL changes in system of power & privilege
The Radical Phase
1912
Indians, urban workers, peasants, want much more sweeping reforms
North: Pancho Villa
South: Emiliano Zapata
1913
CIVIL WAR
· Conservative Coup: General Victoriano HUERTA assassinates Madero; creates dictatorship
· Liberal opponents rally around Venustiano CARRANZA
· Radicals rally around Villa & Zapata
· brutal fighting between Conservatives & liberal-radicals
1914
US troops land at Veracruz
Huerta resigns
Carranza new president
1916
US invades northern Mexico, hunting Villa
1917
“Radical Constitution of 1917” - calls for political, social, and economic democracy
1919
Radicals destroyed:
· 1919, Zapata assassinated
· 1923, Villa assassinated
The Restoration of Order
1920
Pres. Carranza assassinated
Gen. Obregon becomes president
Obregon pleases Conservatives by restoring Order
But pleases some Liberals by keeping parts of Radical Constitution
VI. Aftermath:
A. 1,000,000 dead?
B. Destruction of radicals – yet – continuing radicalism among Indians, Workers, Students
C. Liberals, moderates retain power: attacks on Church; some social investment
· Creation of the “PRI” – Institutional Revolutionary Party
D. 1934-40: CARDENAS ERA: last burst of reform (education, land reform, support for trade unions, NATIONALIZATION OF OIL INDUSTRY)
E. 1940s à 1990s: Conservative Swing: PRI as Bureaucratic Dictatorship
· PRI creates huge bureaucracy
· still “radical” in theory
· increasingly conservative in practice
· POSITIVES: law & order; stability; slow economic growth
· NEGATIVES: enormous corruption; poverty grows; Indians, workers, poor still alienated from “system”
|
Undergraduate
Programs McColl
Graduate School of Business Graduate
and Adult Education |
Queens University of Charlotte
1900 Selwyn Avenue Charlotte, NC 28274
Modified by: H. Kamerling